Performance Evaluation and Comparative Study on Effectiveness for a Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger with Baffles using Nanofluids
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Nanoparticles attracted many researchers because of their significant heat transfer
newlineenhancement properties in various applications. The nanoparticles have variable
newlineproperties and a high specific surface area, which enhance heat exchange between fluids
newlineand their particles at different volume concentrations. This research work provides the
newlineoutcomes of an experiment on the coefficient of overall heat transfer (Uo) and
newlineeffectiveness (and#949;) in shell and tube heat exchanger (STHE) with a 25% baffle-cut. It uses
newlineAl2O3-DW, CuO-DW and Hybrid (Al2O3-CuO-DW) nanofluids consisting of base fluid
newlinedistilled water with Al2O3, CuO and hybrid nanoparticles (Al2O3-CuO) at 0.05, 0.1 and
newline0.2 % of volume fractions with varied mass flow nanofluids between 0 to 1 lpm. Using a
newlinetwo-step method, adding a weight fraction of 0.1, 0.15 and 0.125 percent of SDBS
newline(Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate) as a surface-active agent to each volume
newlineconcentration of Al2O3-DW, CuO-DW and Hybrid nanofluids, respectively for better
newlinestability. Increasing the volume fractions of the nanoparticles in the base fluid DW
newlineenhances the thermophysical properties like density, thermal conductivity and dynamic
newlineviscosity of the nanofluids, but it decreases the specific heat (Cp) of the nanofluids.
newlineOverall, this resulted in enhancing the heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids.
newlineAl2O3-DW, CuO-DW and Hybrid nanofluids at different concentrations in parallel
newlineand counter flow variations of the STHE enhance the Uo and and#949; compared to water, but
newlinecounter flow provides higher effectiveness. During counterflow of STHE, the maximum
newlineeffectiveness (and#949;) values are 2.09%, 2.93%, 4.03% for 0.05% concentration, 2.79%,
newline3.85%, 5.09% for 0.1% concentration and 4.16%, 5.66%, 7.16% for 0.2% concentration
newlineof Al2O3-DW, CuO-DW and hybrid nanofluids at 0.6 lpm mass flow respectively,
newlinecompared to water. Among water, Al2O3-DW, CuO-DW and hybrid nanofluids
newlinecomparative study at various selected concentrations in parallel and counterflow of
newlineSTHE, the hybrid nanofluid will give maxim