Effect of vitamin E and selenium feed supplements on performance oxidative stress immunity and heat shock protein expression in broiler chicken
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of dietary
newlinesupplementation of vitamin E and Selenium on the growth performance, oxidative stress,
newlineimmunity and heat shock protein expression in Broiler chicken. Two hundred and forty
newline(240) day-old commercial Vencobb 400 broiler chicks were randomly divided into four
newlineexperimental groups viz. T0 (unsupplemented control), T1 (Vitamin E at 100 mg/kg and
newlineSelenium at 0.2 mg/kg), T2 (Vitamin E at 125 mg/kg and Selenium at 0.25 mg/kg) and T3
newline(Vitamin E at 150 mg/kg and Selenium at 0.3 mg/kg) groups of 60 chicks each subdivided
newlineinto 3 equal replicates. The experimental birds were offered ad libitum quantities of four
newlineexperimental rations either without supplementation or with supplementation of different
newlinelevels of vitamin E and selenium from 0 to 7 days, 8 to 21 days, and 22 to 42 days of age.
newlineDuring the experiment, weekly body weight and daily feed intake, total body weight
newlinegain, total feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), survivability rate, BPEI, various blood
newlinehaematological and bio-chemicals constituents, antioxidant enzymes, heat shock protein,
newlineimmunity, cortisol, carcass characteristics like dressing percentage, cut up parts percentage,
newlinerelative organ and giblets weight, physicochemical properties of breast meat were studied
newlineand recorded.
newlineThe mean total body weight (g) was 2120.0±33.5, 2292.9±14.7, 2219.0±16.4 and
newline2179.9±9.08 and mean total weight gain (g) was 2077.7±14.5, 2250.6±14.7, 2176.6±14.3
newlineand 2137.6±9.08 for T0, T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively. The mean total feed intake (g)
newlinewas 4062.75±0.08, 4156.53±0.77, 4151.91±0.35 and 4117.85±11.67 and the average feed
newlineconversion ratios was 1.92±0.04, 1.81±0.01, 1.88±0.04 and 1.87±0.04 for T0, T1, T2 and T3
newlinegroups, respectively. T1 group attained significantly higher (Plt0.05) final body weight and
newlinebody weight gain compared to all the other groups. T2 group did not differ significantly
newline(Pgt0.05) with T3 group; but, had a significantly higher (Plt0.05) final body weight over T0
newlinegroup. Total feed intake (g) in T1 g