Admissibility of an Artificial Intelligence Enabled Entity for Claiming Intellectual Property Rights a Comparative Study About Its Implications

Abstract

Evidently, the exclusivity of the human intellectual ingenuity has now started to blur with the newlinehuman beings own creation of the machines, viz. Artificial Intelligence Enabled Machines newline[AIEM], which is penetrating in every sphere of business and society across the globe. newlineObserving the contemporary pulsation, we can irrefutably deduce that the rate of evolution as newlinewell as the rate of revolution of technology are astonishingly rushing-up, with the usage of newlinespecific machines. Unlike the ordinary machines, these AIEMs explicitly possess a certain newlinedegree of machine-based intellect and personality traits, as their distinctive functionality. And newlinethey are exhibiting an undeniable capability, of not only supplementing or complementing the newlineintellectual proficiency of a human being; but also displaying an exquisite competence, in newlineconceiving an idea or product; in their own capacity independently. newlineNevertheless, despite the deep rooted and human-centric evolution of intellectual property laws newlineacross various eras and nations, the need for considering a non-human; namely Artificial newlineIntelligence Enabled Entity [AIEE], such as DABUS [Device for the Autonomous newlineBootstrapping of Unified Sentience] and the gynoid Sophia, for conferring any Intellectual newlineProperty Right [IPR] has never been so perplexing and challenging, as it has turned out today. newlineThere have been many clear initiatives of keeping Human-in-the-Centre in majority of newlineArtificial Intelligence [AI] based policy, regulation and governance models from many private newlineas well as state organizations. Nevertheless, the road to settle for acknowledging the prospects newlineof an AI as an IPR claimant vis-à-vis to humankind is still not full of roses. newline newline newline