Comparative evaluation of rate of canine retraction with hycon device and NiTi coil spring a randomized control trial
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Introduction
newlineOrthodontic research has always focused on the development of
newlinenewer techniques which will focus on faster and more effective tooth
newlinemovement. Most orthodontic patients complain of either crowding or
newlineanterior proclination and this may often require extractions for correction.
newlineAfter the first phase of orthodontic treatment of levelling and aligning, the
newlineremaining extraction space is closed by anterior retraction or posterior
newlineprotraction or combination of both depending on the anchorage
newlinerequirement. Modern orthodontics employs various fixed appliance
newlinesystems, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Appliance
newlinebiocompatibility, orthodontic treatment efficiency and patient comfort are
newlinethe major issues confronting today s orthodontists.
newlineOrthodontic space closure has always been a challenge for the
newlineorthodontist. Space closure using fixed appliances is usually
newlineaccomplished using a variety of methods namely friction or frictionless
newlinemechanics and brought by either individual canine retraction followed by
newlineincisor retraction or en-masse retraction.
newlineAims and Objectives
newlineThe aim of this study is to compare the rate of individual canine
newlineretraction with HYCON device and NiTi coil spring.
newlineMaterials and Methodology
newline10 of 110
newlineThe study was designed as a randomized control trial, which
newlineincluded 10 patients above the age of 15 years, requiring maxillary first
newlinepremolar extraction, divided into two groups, one receiving HYCON
newlinedevice on the right side and NiTi coil spring on the left and the other
newlinegroup receiving the HYCON device on the left and NiTi coil spring on the
newlineright. The patients were recalled every 28 days and records were taken at
newlineeach review. Rate of canine retraction was assessed in both the groups
newlineand statistical analysis was conducted.
newlineResults
newlineAn independent t test revealed a significant difference in the rate of
newlinecanine retraction between the two groups with greater rate of movement
newlinewith NiTi coil spring.