Effect of contrast training vs traditional strength training on selected physiological biochemical and physical variables of athletes

Abstract

Research has shown that plyometric training is effective. Contrast training has gained favour as a training approach combining weight training and plyometric exercise. According to anecdotal evidence, training in this way will enhance athletic ability and muscular strength. Current studies have looked into contrast training. The outcomes of recent research are helpful in directing practitioners in the development and execution of contrast training programs, even though uncertainties still surround the potential effectiveness and implementation of this sort of training. newlineContrast training appears to be a topic of interest for conditioning specialists, according to anecdotal observations, publications, and conference presentations on the subject. Professionals with an empirical mind set have replied with information to direct the use of sophisticated training. Since both types of training can be carried out concurrently in the same setting, contrast training can be a minimally effective way to plan combined weight training and plyometric training. Although the field of contrast training is a burning topic in the research community, there are several aspects related to protocol of strength training which still need investigation. There are very few studies conducted on female athletes related to contrast training. One such research gap related to kind of strength training for female athletes was undertaken for investigation. newlineThe purpose of the study was to investigate and compare the effects of two different types of strength training i.e., contrast training and traditional strength training by observing their effects on selected dependent variables among university athletes.