Performance Evaluation of Foam Concrete with Silica Fume in Structural Applications
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Lightweight concrete (LWC) is gaining prominence as a sustainable
newlineconstruction material due to its reduced density, lower material consumption, and
newlineenhanced energy efficiency. Among the other types of lightweight concrete s, Foam
newlineConcrete (FC) stands out as an innovative and environmentally friendly alternative,
newlinecharacterized by its self-compacting nature, thermal insulation properties, and potential
newlinefor incorporating industrial by-products such as fly ash and silica fume. FC is produced
newlineby mixing cement-based slurry with foam. FC due to its high air-void nature in concrete
newlineproduces low compressive strength. Therefore, incorporating coarse aggregate reduces
newlinethe air-void ratio and improves compressive strength. The aim of the study is to develop
newlinea sustainable FC mix using silica fume as a cement replacement and the addition of
newlinecoarse aggregate for structural application.
newlinePreliminary investigations were performed on the basic raw materials and the
newlinemix design was formulated based on a trial-and-error method. A total of 19 mixes with
newlinevarying proportions of Foam Volume (FV) and Coarse Aggregate (CA) were carried
newlineout. Mechanical tests such as compression test, split tensile test, and flexural strength
newlinetest were performed. From The results 3% FV and fine aggregate to coarse aggregate
newlineratio of 1:1 was found to be optimized FC mix (3F2C50A i.e., 3F = 3% FV, 2C = 1:2
newlineFA/C and 50A = replacement of 50% CA with FA). After optimizing the FC mix, Silica
newlineFume (SF) was replaced from 2% to 10% as a binder ratio to improve the properties and
newlinedurability of FC. The Fresh and hardened concrete properties of FC were studied. From
newlinethe results, it indicates that FC with 3% FV, fine aggregate to coarse aggregate ratio of
newline1:1 and 10% SF was considered to be an optimized mix (3F2C50A10S i.e., 3F = 3%
newlineFV, 2C = 1:2 FA/C, 50A = replacement of 50% CA with FA and 10S = 10% SF) and FC
newlinewith 3% FV and without coarse aggregate was found to be a conventional mix (3F2C
newlinei.e., 3F = 3% FV and 2C = 1:2 FA/C).
newline